December 23 2024 17:14:39
News Photos Forum Search Contact History Linkbox Calendar
 
Forum Threads
Newest Threads
The MAGA chronicles
Starship orbital lau...
It's a trap!
AI discussion
Covers that Rock
The Tech billionaire...
Covers that never sh...
Besti ella størsti ...
Good music that peop...
UFO incidents
Linkbox
Newest Links
Microsoft CEO: Agent... (0)
The David Gilmour In... (0)
The Thesis that Kill... (0)
ahh, yes. Just what ... (0)
Jordan Peterson - no... (3)
Musk spreading misin... (2)
Adam Savage doesn't ... (0)
I Hired A F1 Driver ... (0)
The "Conspiracy" to ... (0)
The Three Night Nort... (1)
Random Photo
Gongumenn at arms! IX
Gongumenn at arms! IX
Various pictures by Jogvanth

Member Poll
Should I watch "The Rings of Power"?

Yes

No

LOL

You must login to vote.
Link
 CategoryLink
Rating
InterestSome solid programming advice imho
3

Comments
Vuzman on June 06 2019 08:41:31
This is just another way of expressing the ancient development principle of "Make it work, make it right, make it fast", also expressed as "Make it work, then make it better".

This is why we have TDD, refactoring, etc. It's definitely a good principle, but, to play devil's advocate, the functional requirements are fulfilled after the first step, so if you're on a deadline, why make it better, when it already works? Project leaders (and PO's, customers, etc.) have a notoriously hard time understanding why you need more time to do more work, when it already works!
Grizlas on June 06 2019 10:27:01
Short term will almost always win out over long term in competitive business scenarios, I think. At least - that is my experience smiley

It is hard to justify the extra time, especially if there is any doubt at all about the future of the product.

But what I like most about this, is the more general idea of not committing yourself to a certain design before later on. I think this is a common mistake many companies make. Take, for instance, the area of 2nd generation nuclear reactors and especially molten salt reactors. There are about 20-30 competing designs already in development, that all have in common the fact that they cant get regulatory approval, because they haven't been tested in a real fission environment - something of a catch-22. On the other side, you have some researchers from the Netherlands that have no design yet, but are instead trying to get a simple salt loop placed inside the pool of an existing reactor, so they can study molten salt chemistry and how materials react to it. Their argument is, that you cannot make a good reactor design until you understand the quite complex chemistry, metallurgy etc. of the materials involved. I think this is the better approach - get as far as you can without committing to a specific design, so that you, later on, can make better decisions.
Post Comment
Please Login to Post a Comment.
Login
Username

Password



Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Last Seen Users
Grizlas00:42:14
Torellion12:46:06
Norlander14:34:40
OKJones16:52:06
Boddin 1 day
Vuzman 3 days
Spiff 1 week
fjallsbak 7 weeks
Laluu18 weeks
Anubis_fo22 weeks
Obituaries
You must login to post a message.

Grizlas
06/11/2024 20:17
Finally.

Norlander
05/11/2024 13:14
tta finally works again

Vuzman
26/08/2024 07:45
Try the google search box

Grizlas
24/08/2024 23:30
doubtful

OKJones
24/08/2024 22:08
does the search function even work?

Grizlas
24/12/2023 15:06
Gleðilig jól

Norlander
24/12/2023 10:09
Gleðilig jól!

Norlander
29/10/2023 19:16
:/

Grizlas
29/10/2023 11:35
RIP Matthew Perry.

Norlander
25/08/2023 19:22
That's not from the chess scene, it's Omar to Wee Bay, 2 mins into this clip: https://www.youtube.com/w
atch?v=LF0Xt6b525E