September 12 2025 20:38:48
News Photos Forum Search Contact History Linkbox Calendar
 
Forum Threads
Newest Threads
Starship orbital lau...
Covers that Rock
Great live performances
AI discussion
new tab page
Good music that peop...
The MAGA chronicles
Stand up comedy
It's a trap!
The Tech billionaire...
Linkbox
Newest Links
News too depressing?... (0)
How Comedy Became a ... (0)
Disney prog band tak... (0)
Will humanoid robots... (0)
a fan told Rainbolt ... (2)
The NBA Stat that Co... (0)
RIP Brent Hinds (0)
Some thoughts from K... (0)
real power (foundati... (2)
Rick Beato's Pop Mus... (0)
Random Photo
Member Poll
Should I watch "The Rings of Power"?

Yes

No

LOL

You must login to vote.
Link
 CategoryLink
Rating
FollowupWikileaks: Huge corps and shadow governments
5

Comments
Norlander on December 09 2010 15:40:57
I fail to see what's the bad thing here though... and no that is not flamebait.
Grizlas on December 09 2010 16:20:01
Well, I for one don't think it is good that profit-driven corporations are able to dictate policy in a third world country. I'm not saying that this is proof that Shell controls Nigeria, but if it were the case, I wouldn't think it good.
Norlander on December 09 2010 22:51:25
There will always be groups that influence politicians, be it corporations or NGOs. I for one think that a corporation like Shell, which is concerned about what people think of them, is preferable to Gazprom or PetroChina.
Grizlas on December 10 2010 08:30:17
I don't give half a goats fart for Shell's "concerns" about anything besides profits.

No doubt there exists a corporation somewhere, whose level of pure cartoonish evil makes Shell look like a schoolboy's lemonade stand, but I would want neither dictating policy.
Norlander on December 10 2010 18:17:00
Well then there is no news, since as i started with saying: "There will always be groups that influence politicians."
Grizlas on December 10 2010 18:53:24
That's a bit overly pragmatic isn't it? having persons attached to every key position in a government, seems to me to be slightly more than just "influence".

You sure you're not following this pattern:

Before: YOU'RE CRAZY.
After: Who didn't know this already? Let's ignore it fellas.

I seem to be seeing it all over.
Norlander on December 10 2010 20:18:55
Yeah I'm sure, since I work with people in government in 4-5 countries, including the EU and have seen how things are measured. For instance you won't be accepted in a FP7 application unless you have a certain "broad" geographical spread of members, which in most cases means "a french company", why? Because France exerts pressure so their companies get money, why? Because the same companies influence every level of the French bureaucracy.

Same works for Danida. If you want Danida to support a project, that project needs to have 50% of it's value done by danish companies (in particular COWI and Rambøll), why? Because said companies lobby for that to become law. Yes it's actually in the development aid law.

When business associates work with bringing new alternative energy to Sweden, they need Vattenfall (or any of the 3 medium energy companies) on board, otherwise it's "nearly" a waste of time. Of course unless you have backing from a Wallenberg company.

And I don't need to remind you how Mærsk/Novo control danish bureaucracy.
Grizlas on December 10 2010 21:32:43
I'm sure your facts are in order, but this is knowledge gleaned through your personal experience and research. If you could document what you say sufficiently to prove beyond a doubt that the FP7 is corrupted, wouldn't that be news?.

Many believe there's no such thing as an honest politician, but that doesn't mean it isn't news when one is found to be crooked. People don't simply say "of course he was crooked! all politicians are. This is not news!".
Norlander on December 10 2010 23:00:42
My point is that they are honest politicians, since they look after their interests, i.e. companies in their constituency and the jobs they provide.

You are free to vote for far left politicians, who do not have these ties (instead they have ties to NGOs), if you think this is horrible.
Norlander on December 10 2010 23:03:05
As for the case in Nigeria, there is no way their politicians won't be influenced by a major provider of FDI, it would be irresponsible of them not to be. My original comment relating to Shell over PetroChina/Gazprom was explaining my preference to a company which is in turned influenced by us here in the "western world" (which I prefer to label the OECD countries.
Post Comment
Please Login to Post a Comment.
Login
Username

Password



Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Last Seen Users
fjallsbak06:28:25
Torellion06:57:22
OKJones22:44:44
Norlander 1 day
Grizlas 1 day
Vuzman 1 day
Spiff 1 week
Vester 3 weeks
hendrikfo 4 weeks
Aliennizer 6 weeks
Obituaries
You must login to post a message.

Grizlas
05/09/2025 14:40
RIP Giorgio Armani!

OKJones
04/09/2025 16:17
Obituaries LOL! smiley

Grizlas
25/08/2025 11:40
Southpark s27e03 is worth checking out - hilarious

Grizlas
14/08/2025 07:48
this one is also pretty slick

Grizlas
07/08/2025 16:52
Agreed

OKJones
07/08/2025 14:24
This banner is the best so far

Grizlas
25/07/2025 07:25
works with no issues in normal version of Firefox. I'm guessing you either did not do CTRL+F5 or are using some adblock plugin.

Norlander
25/07/2025 04:52
Use Firefox and it blocks all sorts of unwanted stuff of course.

Grizlas
24/07/2025 14:57
Using some ad-blocker? Try ctrl+F5

Norlander
24/07/2025 12:25
its mostly just grey for me...