| Norlander | The Enterprise meets the Imperial Fleet |
|
|  |
| | Field Marshal |  |
| | Group: Administrator,
Klikan,
Regulars,
Outsiders
| | Location: Copenhagen | | Joined: 09.06.06 | | Posted on 31-05-2007 04:02 |
|
Well made IMO.
|
The conventional view serves to protect us from the painful job of thinking.
- John Kenneth Galbraith |
|
|
|
| Aliennizer | RE: The Enterprise meets the Imperial Fleet |
|
|  |
| | Familiar |  |
| | Group: Klikan
| | Location: Copenhagen | | Joined: 05.10.06 | | Posted on 31-05-2007 08:14 |
|
I agree, though I would have liked to see those nancy boys from Star Trek annihilated. Nothing compares to the power of the dark side. 
|
- Not all those who wander are lost -- J.R.R. Tolkien |
|
|
|
|
| Vuzman | RE: The Enterprise meets the Imperial Fleet |
|
|  |
| | Admiral | |
| | Group: Klikan,
Outsiders,
Administrator,
Regulars
| | Location: Copenhagen, DK | | Joined: 10.06.06 | | Posted on 31-05-2007 10:36 |
|
Darth Vador?
|
When I kill her, I'll have her
Die white girls, die white girls |
|
|
|
| Grizlas | RE: The Enterprise meets the Imperial Fleet |
|
|  |
| | General | |
| | Group: Administrator,
Klikan,
Regulars,
Outsiders
| | Location: Denmark | | Joined: 08.06.06 | | Posted on 31-05-2007 10:40 |
|
speaking of the enterprise - it's not a small ship
http://www.rfjason.com/?p=33
|
You want to tempt the wrath of the whatever from high atop the thing? |
|
|
|
|
| Norlander | RE: The Enterprise meets the Imperial Fleet |
|
| |
| | Field Marshal | |
| | Group: Administrator,
Klikan,
Regulars,
Outsiders
| | Location: Copenhagen | | Joined: 09.06.06 | | Posted on 31-05-2007 14:02 |
|
This Star Trek vs Star Wars debate has been raging for over a quarter century now, and looking around and reading up on this today I found that several sites try to best deconstruct the technobabble to get to an informed and biasted opinion.
One of the best sites I found (via wikipedia) is this one: http://st-v-sw.net/STSWcompare.html. This guy goes to great lenghts to debunk the most vivid claims - such as random amounts of gigawatts to come to some sort of informed conclusion based on size and physics...nerd ftw
Now as for your model of the Enterprise Grizlas, yes it's not small (642m)...but it's apparently tiny compared to a Super Star Destroyer, which is 17600 meters in lenght and covers an area bigger then Sandoy
|
The conventional view serves to protect us from the painful job of thinking.
- John Kenneth Galbraith |
|
|
|
|
| Torellion | RE: The Enterprise meets the Imperial Fleet |
|
|  |
| | Regular | |
| | Group: Klikan
| | Joined: 08.06.06 | | Posted on 31-05-2007 15:31 | |
|
For an imaginary ship, a Super Star Destroyer is not that big. Just ask Grizlas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Norlander | RE: The Enterprise meets the Imperial Fleet |
|
| |
| | Field Marshal | |
| | Group: Administrator,
Klikan,
Regulars,
Outsiders
| | Location: Copenhagen | | Joined: 09.06.06 | | Posted on 31-05-2007 17:19 |
|
|
The conventional view serves to protect us from the painful job of thinking.
- John Kenneth Galbraith |
|
|
|
|
| Norlander | RE: The Enterprise meets the Imperial Fleet |
|
| |
| | Field Marshal | |
| | Group: Administrator,
Klikan,
Regulars,
Outsiders
| | Location: Copenhagen | | Joined: 09.06.06 | | Posted on 03-06-2007 17:58 |
|
Now somebody added b5 to the mix...
|
The conventional view serves to protect us from the painful job of thinking.
- John Kenneth Galbraith |
|
|
|
|
| Norlander | RE: The Enterprise meets the Imperial Fleet |
|
| |
| | Field Marshal | |
| | Group: Administrator,
Klikan,
Regulars,
Outsiders
| | Location: Copenhagen | | Joined: 09.06.06 | | Posted on 03-06-2007 18:03 |
|
And now with BGS aswell
Creative people with free time...
|
The conventional view serves to protect us from the painful job of thinking.
- John Kenneth Galbraith |
|
|
|
|
